Wikipedia as a reliable source

Loc Vu-Quocprofessor for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Floridastated in that "sometimes errors may go for years without being corrected as experts don't usually read Wikipedia articles in their own field to correct these errors".

Some news organizations have used Wikipedia articles as a source for their work. Tertiary sources are such as articles in the press, most books for children, popular books by authors who are not experts. When a Wikipedia user rewrites the information in these sources in their own words, the meaning may be different from what is true.

If a website is selling a product or promoting something, it is not a reliable source, as the information provided is there to help make money.

The Top 10 Reasons Students Cannot Cite or Rely On Wikipedia

Secondary sources, such as meta-analysestextbooks, and scholarly review articles are preferred when available, so as to provide proper context. Some publishers like the BBC become well known for having a reliable publication process.

Some examples of fringe theories are conspiracy theories and ideas about science that do not have much scientific support. My friend went on and edited a bunch of Wikipedia pages and put my name there.

What should I do if I find an article that has no sources. According to Bury, the trick to using Wikipedia is to understand that "just because it's in an encyclopedia free, web or printed doesn't mean it's true. The result is that a steady group of high-level editors has more control over Wikipedia than ever.

Editorial commentary, analysis and opinion pieceswhether written by the editors of the publication editorials or outside authors op-eds are reliable primary sources for statements attributed to that editor or authorbut are rarely reliable for statements of fact.

Other documents are written by people who have studied the subject for many years, and many other people have read them carefully to make sure that the information is correct. More importantly, he used his authority to ban more than 2, contributors with opposing viewpoints from making further contributions.

You may not know, but the Dalai Lama is regarded as a highly qualified Tibetan scholar by Tibetans - he got his Geshe Lharampa higher degree with honours aged only Just because something comes up in the top 10 on MSN Search or Google does not automatically give it credibility or vouch for its accuracy or importance.

Editors should therefore beware of circular sourcing. It may be impossible to provide a stable source for the alleged ranking; When only self-published by the vendor, i. Help with sources Sources used in Wikipedia should have been published.

As with other reviews it comments that one should assess one's sources and what is desired from them, and that "Wikipedia may be an appropriate resource for some assignments, but not for others. Wikipedia:Reliable sources. Jump to navigation Jump to search. This This is a guideline about the types of sources which are reliable.

Wikipedia articles should use reliable, third-party, These are called reliable sources. How reliable a source is depends on context. Wikipedia articles should be based on reliable, published sources, making sure that all majority and significant minority views that have appeared in those sources are covered (see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view).If no reliable sources can be found on a topic, Wikipedia should not have an article on it.

The guideline in this page discusses the reliability of various types of sources. Numerous studies have rated Wikipedia's accuracy. On the whole, the web encyclopedia is fairly reliable, but Life's Little Mysteries own small investigation produced mixed results.

Each source must be carefully weighed to judge whether it is reliable for the statement being made in the Wikipedia article and is an appropriate source for that content.

Wikipedia:Reliable sources

In general, the more people engaged in checking facts, analyzing legal issues, and scrutinizing the writing, the more reliable the publication. Wikipedia is increasingly used by people in the academic community, from first-year students to professors, as the easiest source of information about anything and everything.

Wikipedia:Reliable sources.

Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources

Jump to navigation Jump to search. This This is a guideline about the types of sources which are reliable. Wikipedia articles should use reliable, third-party, These are called reliable sources.

How reliable a source is depends on context.

Wikipedia as a reliable source
Rated 3/5 based on 64 review
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources - Wikipedia